color
·
pro
· 80% confidence
Line-level (Seamaster 300M green variant): green owners consistently describe the dial/bezel green as changing dramatically with lighting — a dark, sophisticated green or near-black indoors and in low light, bright emerald in sunlight — and many consider it a versatile, understated colour.
Source
durability
·
con
· 65% confidence
Line-level (Seamaster 300M replica): a buyer reported the lume as underwhelming ('the lume is not really strong'), with the seller replying that it only charges under strong light — consistent with independent write-ups warning that replica lume charges and decays faster than the genuine Super-LumiNova.
Source
durability
·
con
· 60% confidence
Line-level (Seamaster 300M replica): overview discussions of Seamaster 300M replicas warn that water resistance is not tested to the same standard as the genuine 300 m rating and that replica watches should not be trusted for real water use, with bracelet edges sometimes sharp and bezel action stiff.
Source
other
·
tip
· 95% confidence
The listing title markets this as a 'Rolex green watch', but the actual spec sheet describes an Omega Seamaster 300M-style dive watch (42 mm 316L steel case, ceramic unidirectional bezel, helium escape valve, 9-link steel bracelet). Buyers should expect an Omega Seamaster-pattern watch, not a Rolex.
Source
other
·
tip
· 65% confidence
Check note for Seamaster 300M replicas: many 1:1 copies use a 2824-based movement in which the date is set by turning the crown upward, whereas the genuine 8800 movement sets the date when turning downward — a quick way to tell what is inside.
Source
quality
·
con
· 70% confidence
Line-level (Seamaster 300M replica): a Weidian buyer rated the watch about 90% visually similar but flagged the bracelet as the weak point — it binds when flexed, the polishing is not smooth enough, and the clasp is not precisely made.
Source
quality
·
mixed
· 70% confidence
Line-level (Seamaster 300M replica): buyers on a Weidian comment page report high visual similarity (90–95%) to the genuine watch and acceptable timekeeping, while noting the movement still differs from the original and that a direct side-by-side comparison reveals gaps.
Source
quality
·
con
· 75% confidence
Line-level (Seamaster 300M): the steel bracelet is the most criticised component — owners describe it as head-heavy/uncomfortable and 'always complained about', with several preferring the rubber strap for comfort.
Source
